Information Is No Longer the Advantage
AI has made finding the signal easier. The advantage has moved to understanding what the signal actually means.
READ ESSAY →INSIGHTS
Ideas about judgment, decision-making and what changes when answers become abundant.
Essays on how AI changes the way people interpret information, make business decisions and decide what deserves trust, attention and action.
ESSAYS
Eleven essays, building on each other, from information becoming abundant, to what still requires judgment once AI gets it right, gets faster, surfaces more than anyone can weigh, puts a person in the loop without any guarantee of judgment, answers before you've had the chance to think for yourself, excludes an input without necessarily excluding its influence, explains itself without necessarily justifying itself, and completes a control without necessarily proving the control worked.
AI has made finding the signal easier. The advantage has moved to understanding what the signal actually means.
READ ESSAY →Even when AI is accurate, correct and staying within its authority, the decision in front of you can still be genuinely hard.
READ ESSAY →Some delay is processing time, and AI is dissolving it. Some delay is reality producing evidence that doesn't exist yet — and no amount of speed changes that.
READ ESSAY →An outcome tells you what happened. It rarely tells you what would have happened if you'd chosen differently — and AI can scale that mistake fast.
READ ESSAY →If AI increasingly performs the work through which people historically developed judgment, where does the next generation's judgment come from?
READ ESSAY →AI has gotten remarkably good at surfacing relevant information. It hasn't solved the separate problem of deciding what deserves weight.
READ ESSAY →Human review is a process condition. Human judgment is a cognitive act. The workflow can require one. It cannot guarantee the other.
READ ESSAY →AI doesn't only influence the answer. Sometimes it influences the thinking that happens before you reach one.
READ ESSAY →Excluding a protected characteristic doesn't guarantee its influence is gone. Checking the inputs is not enough. Judgment has to examine what they produce together.
READ ESSAY →A detailed explanation tells you why a model reached its conclusion. It doesn't tell you whether that conclusion deserves to be acted on.
READ ESSAY →A completed review can be fully compliant and still tell you nothing about whether anyone exercised judgment inside it.
READ ESSAY →THE CENTRAL IDEA